Digital Hollywood, behind the times

May 5, 2013

Digital Hollywood1small

Digital Hollywood debuted in 1990, a conference bringing together industry leaders from across multiple service categories:film, television, music, home video, cable, telecommunications and computers… unfortunately, the entire format seems to be stuck there.  To be fair, I attended three panels out of dozens in a single day.  But check out their website.  It’s terrible.  Egregiously so.

Digital Hollywood2small

Amid the shameless promotion, my favorite insights came from Gregg Colvin, SVP/ Director of Digital Communications at Universal McCann, Andrew Solmssen, managing director for POSSIBLE Agency, Mark Ghuneim, CEO of Trendrr, and Anna Wilding, producer, creative, and charity founder.

Digital Hollywood5small

While Hollywood seems to struggle with branded content and brands still seem to struggle with social media, we must remember branded entertainment is the future AND the past.

Remember the origin of soap operas like P&G. (And you must never forget
their weird satires like Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman.) This ad-sponsored content made it OK for glamorous women to use P&G
products: soap, floor wax, etc.  Humans respond to the cues of other humans.  This response supersedes any existing product benefit or brand loyalty.

Digital Hollywood4small

Another point of discussion: the consolidation of screens.  It was pointed out repeatedly that differentiating between devices will eventually become obsolete: the difference between the smallest tablet and the largest phone is less than an inch.  The difference between the largest tablet and the smallest laptop is less than an inch.  We’re consolidating!

The concept of creating content for a single “intelligent” screen, along with cameras and individual-adaptive recognization features is currently in the works.

Digital Hollywood3small

Despite evil TVs of the future, as the buzz at Digital Hollywood went… television is respectable again! Celebrate. Television is GOOD AGAIN.

The quality of on-demand, time-shifted television shows is turning the idiot box into a formidable foe for Internet and theatrical content. We’ve known for a while that consumers are spending less on entertainment but consuming more than ever. This pattern won’t reverse, and everyone’s getting in on the content game. An astounding statistic: Netflix-produced House of Cards gained the company 2 million new users alone.

Digital-Hollywood6small

The future is here. And with all the ominous camera/ single screen/ connected features beginning to surround us, in some 1984-esque future, transparency is is paramount.  Listen to your customers, respect your
customers, and be honest.  Trust lost is difficult to regain.

Live, learn, and optimize.

xo,
suzymae

Tyler the Creator’s totally planned Mountain Dew offensive

May 5, 2013

Apologizing for content has become its own strategy:

Tyler the Creator recently partnered with Mountain Dew with an ad featuring a lineup of black men,a white police officer urging a battered woman to point out the one who abused her:  the abuser is a goat named Felicia.

The Lineup

The video was criticized as racist and sexist.  I have news: the world is racist and sexist.  Black men over-index in incarceration rates, and women are most frequently battered.  Yet, advertising that satirized aspects of reality was pulled from the airwaves.  What protesters didn’t consider was that releasing, then yanking the spot was an effective strategy, and must have been planned.



Vine-tyler

Tyler the Creator owns Vine.  His bizarre videos mirror the Mountain Dew spot.  Satirical, random, and violent: the humor little boys crave and Mountain Dew’s demographic.  The type of kids who love to offend.  Mountain Dew proved themselves to be bold enough to piss off your mom.  They apologized, loudly via sponsored Tweet, to appease the inevitable protests, earning even more media and a wider audience than the spot alone could have reached using traditional targeting methods.   DONE. This isn’t even an apology:

 

Have you ever read 1984?  Have you ever read Catch-22?  These novels couldn’t predict our fractured online content consumption, or social media interaction, but they did foresee the sanitizing of reality.  The pieces of culture that reveal our destructive, misogynistic, outdated forms of social contact are barred from discussion.  Our stories support a fake construct of fairness, while reality continues to exist, in all its cruel and unbalanced forms.

Tyler Apology

Edit:  @kidsleepy at Adland.tv wrote a counterpoint/ great rant/ response to our Twitter interaction.